The recent merger forming TKO Group Holdings combined WWE and UFC under one corporate umbrella and has sparked intense debate about which brand brings more financial muscle to the table.
Both are global giants in sports entertainment, but their business models, revenue streams, and fanbases differ significantly.
So, who contributes more to the combined financials of TKO Holdings? Let’s Dive In:
💰WWE: Sports Entertainment Powerhouse
- Annual Revenue: WWE generated approximately $1.4 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2024, driven primarily by TV rights deals, live events, merchandise, and digital subscriptions (WWE Network + Peacock).
- Profitability: WWE’s operating margins hover around 15-20%, benefiting from large-scale events like WrestleMania and global content licensing.
- Fan Engagement: WWE’s scripted entertainment format garners consistent, year-round viewership and merchandise sales, with a diversified revenue base through multiple types of events.
🥊UFC: Premier MMA Organization
- Annual Revenue: UFC’s revenue is estimated around $1.1 billion in 2024, fueled by pay-per-view sales, media rights deals (ESPN+ in the U.S., DAZN internationally), sponsorships, and live gate receipts.
- Profitability: UFC generally posts higher operating margins near 20-25%, supported by high-margin PPV events and global expansion.
- Event-Driven Revenue: UFC’s earnings spike around blockbuster fights but are more variable seasonally.
📊Financial Comparison & Contribution to TKO
| Metric | WWE (2024) | UFC (2024) | Combined Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Revenue | ~$1.4 billion | ~$1.1 billion | ~$2.5 billion total |
| Operating Margin | ~15-20% | ~20-25% | Potentially higher margin mix |
| Revenue Stability | More consistent year-round | More event-driven spikes | Balanced revenue streams |
| Global Reach | ~180 countries | ~165 countries | Strong global footprint overall |
🔮What This Means for TKO Holdings
- Revenue Weight: WWE currently edges UFC in total revenue, largely due to its extensive media rights deals and recurring content model.
- Profitability Edge: UFC’s high-margin PPV model contributes strong profitability and growth potential.
- Growth Prospects: UFC’s international expansion and growing MMA popularity may close the revenue gap in coming years.
- Synergies: Cross-promotion, shared content platforms, and combined sponsorship deals position TKO for significant growth.
So Who Adds More Value?
While WWE currently adds more in raw revenue to TKO Holdings, UFC’s profitability and growth trajectory make it a formidable counterpart.
Together, they create a diversified sports entertainment giant poised to dominate global markets.
If UFC and WWE not only merge their finances but also their fanbases and marketing strategies, then TKO has the potential to become a pro sports conglomerate, similar to the team sport leagues such as the NFL or NBA.
While yes it does take two companies to make this possible, the merger will not just gain the ownership group more profit.
It will also lead to larger fighter contracts and make the sport of UFC and WWE more financially viable for all competitors, rather than only the best of the best.
Next Reads
- How UFC Promotion Drives Revenue
- The Financial Evolution of WWE’s Royal Rumble
- Will a Non-McGregor UFC Fighter Ever Earn $10 Million in a Single Fight?
- Hulk Hogan Career Earnings & WWE Legacy
- Canelo vs. Crawford Revenue & Purse Projections
Credits
Written by: Aidan Anderson
Research and Analysis: Apostle Sports Media LLC
Sources: MLB.com, Spotrac.com, Forbes Sports Money, UFC.com, SBJ, APSM Proprietary Analysis.
Featured Image: Public Domain / Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This article contains general financial information for educational purposes and does not constitute as professional advice.
“The Lord makes firm the steps of the one who delights in him.”
– Psalm 37:23
Apostle Sports Media 