How Much New York & New Jersey Are Spending to Host the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Eight matches. Host of the 2026 World Cup Final.

New Jersey is home to a ~$1.6 billion privately-funded stadium on paper.

New York and NJ have a split transit system that intends to charge Futbol fans $105 for a standardly $13 train ticket, and a state governor has been publicly telling FIFA to pay its own bills, while FIFA publicly tells New Jersey to honor a contract it signed all the way back in 2018.

Every U.S. city hosting 2026 World Cup Matches has a fiscal story.

New York and New Jersey has a fiscal war.

Two states, two governors, one mayor and a combined transit authority with a ~$48 million hole it didn’t ask for.

Meanwhile a city host committee gave ~1,000 discounted train tickets to New York City residents, using money that was raised in New Jersey, while later a NJ senator was standing at a podium, telling FIFA to stop gouging commuters.

FIFA fired back in writing, saying that New Jersey already agreed to provide free transportation to fans attending World Cup games, or for the duration of the event, and needs to stop complaining.

The World Cup Final is on July 19, at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey.

The stadium is roughly nine miles from Midtown Manhattan, with a max capacity of ~82,500.

MetLife is the host of eight World Cup matches, the most of any venue in the tournament, alongside the city of Los Angeles.

Of course because MetLife is connected to New York City, there will be no parking on match days, which is another driver of forced city revenue generation.

NY/NJ Transit is your only real option to get to MetLife whether you start in Jersey or come straight from a tour of Lady Liberty.

Welcome to the most complicated multi-jurisdiction fiscal situation in American sports history, compressed into one summer.

APSM runs every dollar of it, and explains exactly how two-state grant money actually works so you understand what you’re reading when politicians on both sides claim credit.

How Two-State World Cup
Grants Actually Work

Before the numbers, here’s the structural explanation of how funding for World Cup preparations get appropriated to begin with, as well as where they come from and what they are supposed to be used for.

Federal FEMA grants don’t split along state lines automatically. Instead, FEMA awards money to a designated State Administrative Agency, the SAA, in each state.

The SAA then passes the money to sub-recipients like county police departments, transit agencies, and the host committee task force.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which operates the bridges, tunnels, and infrastructure connecting both states, receives funding from both pipelines because it literally spans the state line. Same agency, two funding streams, one operational mission.

So, when you see “New York/New Jersey received X in federal grants”, that’s actually two separate numbers from two separate state-level processes that get combined into one host city label because they share one venue.

This tactic is similar to the one headlines use when they publish gross figures, rather than estimates of net valuations and breakdowns of how much athletes are actually pocketing.

There is a reason that over 70% of pro-athletes end up with a less than million-dollar net worth within five years of retirement, and it’s because no one is educating athletes or fans on financial literacy, at a mass quantity, for free, other than APSM.

The matches taking place are in New Jersey, but the fans attending the matches are largely going to be coming from New York.

The federal government funds both sides of that equation separately and lets them coordinate operationally.

That’s why the political blame game between Trenton and Albany is partly theater, they’re not actually sharing one check.

They’re each responsible for their own jurisdictions, their own spending, and their own grant management.

The fight is about who absorbs the costs that fall in the gaps between those two jurisdictions.

The Funding Stack:
Layer by Layer

Layer 1: FEMA World Cup Security Grant (Combined NY/NJ Allocation)

The combined New York and New Jersey FEMA World Cup Grant Program allocation covers security operations across both states, NYPD deployments in Manhattan fan zones, NJSP operations at MetLife,

Port Authority coverage across tunnels and transit links, and the full emergency management apparatus across the tri-state footprint.

New York State’s C-UAS counter-drone allocation alone was $17.2 million across four agencies, announced by Governor Hochul.

New Jersey received its own parallel C-UAS allocation. Combined federal security investment across both states runs well above $100 million when all FEMA programs are totaled.

Reflecting the scale and complexity of managing eight matches including the final at a venue nine miles from the most densely populated urban core in North America.

Layer 2: NJ Stadium and Infrastructure Investment ($46 million+)

New Jersey has already paid more than $16 million in state taxpayer money for work at the East Rutherford MetLife site, before a single match was even assigned by FIFA.

The New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority, which oversees the MetLife complex, received $30 million to plan designs and upgrades at the stadium and surrounding property.

Those upgrades include the transition from artificial turf to natural grass to meet FIFA’s technical specifications, seating modifications to expand the pitch to FIFA dimensions, field-level camera and broadcast infrastructure, and perimeter security improvements across the stadium campus.

Layer 3: NJ Transit
($183 million+)

The gap was ~$34 million in NJ Transit operational costs, with no confirmed funding source.

FIFA contributed zero dollars toward making the transit system work, their position on the matter was that the original 2018 host city agreements required free transportation for fans to all matches, and New Jersey signed that agreement.

New Jersey’s position/response back to FIFA was that the 2023 FIFA agreement revision was supposed to reduce the initial burden, and the state is still holding a $34 million bag.

Both things can be true simultaneously, New Jersey signed a bad contract in 2018, but FIFA revised the terms in 2023 in a way that didn’t actually solve New Jersey’s problem, rather continued to benefit them while claiming it was benefiting both NY/NJ.

The transit agency is quite literally stuck in the middle of this funding and FIFA dispute.

Layer 4: The $105 Train Ticket

NJ Transit’s solution to the $48 million operational funding gap was to charge fans the needed margins to break even, if not return positive revenue.

NJ Transit initially announced $150 round-trip tickets from New York Penn Station to MetLife, after reduced to $105 after public backlash. Standard fare is $12.90 round-trip. That’s an 8x markup.

The 2014 Super Bowl at MetLife is the data point everyone is pointing to, because for that NJ Transit expected 10,000 to 12,000 Super Bowl riders and ended up moving 30,000, losing ~$5.6 million on the operation despite charging elevated fares.

The World Cup expects 82,500 fans per match, across all eight matches.

The math on what happens if the transit system gets overwhelmed at the World Cup Final is where the story really lies.

Penn Station will shut down all other outbound New Jersey trains beginning four hours before each match.

Essentially the entire regional transit network essentially pauses for the World Cup’s benefit, at the cost of every other NJ Transit commuter trying to go somewhere else that day.

FIFA’s response to Schumer, Sherrill and the state of New Jersey representatives, was again that the state agreed to terms in 2018, contractually, on record, and that they cannot back out of ink to paper.

Layer 5: New York City
Direct Spending (~$66+ million)

Total New York City direct spending for preparations of the World Cup is estimated to be ~$66 million, with NYPD overtime costs on top.

The city projects it will collect $51 million in tax revenue from the tournament, meaning New York City is spending nearly ~$40 million, or more than it expects to collect back in taxes from residents.

That’s a $40 million net loss for the city of New York, explicitly acknowledged in the council documents, which in the U.S. even the state government has a bottom line.

NYC’s argument for why their spending is worth it for global visibility, tourism spillover, economic activity beyond direct tax revenue, and the positioning value of being associated with the World Cup Final even when the actual matches are nine miles away in another state.

Layer 6: Community Grants (~$5 million)

Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill secured more than $5 million in World Cup Community Initiative grants to 34 New Jersey-based organizations, covering local festivals, watch parties, cultural programming, and small business activations across the state.

The funding replaced a single statewide Fan Festival at Liberty State Park that the governor scrapped, opting instead for distributed community events rather than one centralized activation.

Enjoy Reading How
Money Works In Sports?

The APSM “$100M Pro Contract Report” covers how when players sign big contracts in sports,
the reality of the situation is that depending on their residency situation they may net just 35-50%
of their reported gross headline figures.

This report shows you how to properly think of money, from $100k to $100M, and the importance of understanding taxes, residency, agent fees and professional expenses including topics like:

• In-depth contract structure analysis
• Taxes, agent fees, and escrow modeling
• Endorsement and bonus impact scenarios
• Investment & wealth retention strategies
• Real-world case studies of player earnings vs take-home

This report is everything you need to understand how multi-million dollar contracts translate into actual wealth and how to avoid common
financial pitfalls in pro sports.

If you want real financial literacy,
the kind that protects you, not just informs you,

this is the blueprint.

Access the $100M
Pro Contract Report

The Full Spending Picture

Per-match public spend across 8 matches is estimated to be roughly $48 million per match, which by a significant margin is the highest of all U.S.A World Cup host cities.

This is primarily driven by the two-state transit infrastructure investment and NYC’s direct spending on the event.

MetLife Stadium: $1.6 Billion Built With Zero Public Money

Here’s the structural angle that reframes the entire NJ/NY fiscal argument, and it’s the sharpest contrast in this series.

MetLife Stadium cost ~$1.6 billion to build, the most expensive stadium ever constructed, and was funded entirely through private investment by the Giants and Jets, who administer it through a 50/50 joint venture called MetLife Stadium Company.

The New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority owns it on paper, but the two NFL teams built it, funded it, and run it (Jets/Giants).

No public construction bonds. No hotel-motel tax capture. No public debt service.

The Giants and Jets spent $1.6 billion of private money (ownership group), to build the venue hosting the World Cup Final.

Meanwhile, the public across NYC and Jersey are collectively spending ~$386 million to make it safe, accessible, and operational for just eight matches.

Unlike NRG in Houston (61% public funded), Arrowhead in Kansas City (publicly owned), or Mercedes-Benz in Atlanta ($200 million in public bonds), MetLife Stadium is genuinely private.

The public doesn’t own it, didn’t build it, and doesn’t service the debt, which means that the ownership group(s) are going to see massive profits from almost no initial investment other than licensing rights signed to FIFA for the duration of the event.

What the public does own is the $48 million transit problem, which doesn’t go away after the World Cup is over on July 19th, and neither do the $16 million in stadium upgrade costs, the $66 million NYC is spending on an event in another state, and the $34 million operational gap being buried.

The privately-funded stadium is sitting clean, but the publicly-funded ecosystem around it is a hot mess (fiscally). That’s the New York/New Jersey World Cup spending situation in one sentence.

New Jersey Income Tax: 10.75%

New Jersey’s top income tax rate is 10.75%, the second highest in the United States, trailing only California’s 13.3%.

For players competing in the World Cup Final and any other MetLife matches, the jock tax applies to New Jersey-source income at up to 10.75%.

On a $500,000 World Cup performance bonus allocated to the Final, New Jersey collects ~$53,750, compared to $0 in Texas and Florida, ~$27,450 in Georgia, and ~$66,500 in California.

The World Cup Final is the highest-stakes match in the tournament and gathers the most views of any sports event globally, every four years that it’s on.

It will feature players earning some of the largest compensation packages in Futbol, have some of the biggest sponsorship investments of all time, the highest paid players in history and is being hosted primarily by a nation that is not in love with Futbol.

Every dollar of New Jersey-attributed income those players earn, performance bonuses, federation payouts, commercial income allocated to that specific match day, gets taxed at one of the most aggressive state rates in America.

That’s the jock tax reality at the most-watched match in American sports history.

For the full breakdown of how every host state treats player income differently,

Check Out APSM’s State Athlete Tax Glossary

The Economic Picture: ~$3.3 Billion Projected Revenue from NY/NJ matches, $40 Million Net Loss for New York City (who isn’t the host)

The NY/NJ host committee projects eight matches will generate approximately $3.3 billion in total economic impact, including $1.7 billion in visitor spending, 26,000 jobs, and $432 million in state and local tax revenue combined.

That’s the largest economic impact projection in the entire U.S. host city series, and it makes sense given the market.

New York/New Jersey is the largest metro economy in North America.

International fans staying in Manhattan spend more per day than fans anywhere else.

The concentration of luxury hotels, fine dining, and premium hospitality creates a per-visitor spending profile that smaller markets can’t match.

NYC’s own documents project a $40 million net fiscal loss for the city alone.

The host committee is giving discounted tickets to New York residents using money raised in Jersey.

Hotel bookings for June and July are actually down 12% and 8% respectively compared to the same period in 2025, a data point that deserves more coverage than it’s getting, with the tournament starting today.

This same hotels/tourist accommodations underperforming expectations problem is happening across mostly all of the U.S. host cities, which is likely due to people finding cheaper places to stay further away from stadiums and commuting in to the major cities on match days.

The $3.3 billion economic impact flows to private hotels, restaurants, retailers, and transportation operators. The $51 million in NYC tax revenue is the government’s actual take.

The $66 million NYC is spending means the city is projecting a $15 million deficit before NYPD overtime even lands, which doesn’t improve with more projections.

It improves with actual receipts, and those won’t be clear until Q4 of 2026 (if at all).

The $150 Ticket That Went Viral:
A Finance Story

The NJ Transit fare pricing deserves its own breakdown because it’s been covered mostly as an outrage story and almost never as the finance story it actually is.

NJ Transit’s 2014 Super Bowl operation moved 30,000 fans, lost $5.6 million, and caused platform chaos that became a national embarrassment.

The World Cup expects 82,500 per match across eight matches ~660,000 total riders on match days alone, 22 times the Super Bowl volume on a transit system that struggled badly with 30,000.

Priced at $105 round-trip, assuming 20,000 riders per match using NJ Transit rail, that’s ~$2.1 million in fare revenue, per match, and ~$16.8+ million across all eight.

Against $48 million in operational costs, the fares cover 35% of the bill.

The remaining 65%, $31+ million, comes from somewhere else or doesn’t get paid.

NJ Transit’s CEO Kris Kolluri defended the structure as necessary to fund expanded service, manage crowds, and cover security coordination.

He also promised commuters won’t bear the cost, meaning the shortfall gets absorbed by the agency’s operating budget, which is already underfunded.

The $105 ticket is essentially Boston’s $80 ticket with extra steps, for no reason at all, as the transit system in the NYC/MetLife NJ region run together on a daily basis, despite the World Cup happening.

Both transit agencies are trying to recover capital investment costs from event-day riders rather than spreading them across the general fare base.

Both drew public backlash and FIFA pushback.

The difference is scale, NJ Transit’s problem is roughly three times larger than Boston’s.

Three Things to Watch

1.) The $34 million NJ Transit gap

Nobody has publicly explained how the $34 million operational shortfall gets covered.

State budget? Federal supplemental? Event-day fares? A combination?

When it comes to government spending, it seems as if numbers tend to change frequently and underdeliver on promises.

Whether their motivations are public or not, the money is what FIFA, NJ/NY and any state involved in the event are out to get and also have to lose.

When the tournament is over and NJ Transit releases its reconciliation, the real cost of moving 660,000 World Cup fans to and from East Rutherford will be public.

That number is the most important disclosure coming out of any host city, because it will be the determination in how much NYC lost to host the event, when other cities will be profiting.

2.) Whether Tourist Bookings Recover

Advance hotel bookings in the NYC metro were down 12% for June and 8% for July compared to 2025 as of the most recent tracking.

The $3.3 billion economic impact projection depends heavily on hotel occupancy and per-night spending rates, because if the booking trend doesn’t reverse, the economic impact projection takes a serious hit.

Watch NYC Tourism + Conventions’ post-tournament analysis in August.

3. The FIFA contract fight

FIFA says New Jersey agreed to provide free transportation in 2018.

New Jersey says the 2023 revision changed those terms. Neither side has publicly released the full contractual language that determines who’s right.

Post-tournament, expect this to become a legal dispute or at minimum a formal negotiation over how much FIFA contributes to cover NJ Transit’s operational losses.

Given that the same “free transportation” clause exists in every host city agreement, the outcome of Jerseys dispute will set precedent for what transit agencies can recover from FIFA across all 11 cities.

Bottom Line

New York/New Jersey is spending more public money to host the World Cup than any other city in this series, by a lot.

• $386 million in confirmed public investment for eight matches at a $1.6 billion privately-funded stadium owned on paper by New Jersey but built entirely by the Giants and Jets.
• $48 million transit operational problem with $14 million in grants and $34 million in unresolved funding gap.
• New York City projecting to be losing $40 million net on an event happening in another state.
• A governor and a senator publicly calling out FIFA for collecting $11 billion while making states fund their own transportation. FIFA calling them hypocrites for honoring a contract they signed.

What we do know for sure, is that the World Cup Final happens at MetLife Stadium whether anyone agrees on who pays for the trains or not.

Next Reads

• How Much Los Angeles Is Spending to Host the 2026 FIFA World Cup
• How Much Seattle Is Spending to Host the 2026 FIFA World Cup
• Why U.S. Investors are Buying European Soccer Clubs
• New Jersey State Athlete Taxes
• New York State Athlete Taxes

Access the
Pro Contract Report

Disclaimer: This article contains general financial information for educational purposes and does not constitute professional financial advice.